In the free-thought community, religious folks especially
those that lean towards the conservative position, have always been charged with the
inability to think. Possessing closed minds, or choosing not to use it. This,
most people in the free-thought community attribute to the religious indoctrination,
which normally catches hold of one from childhood.
There is certainly no doubt that religion creates an environment
where the believers’ ability to think is dampened as a child. You are taught
not to question the Pastors,Priests, Imams, Rabbi, etc, the Bible, the Qur’aan etc. It is "blasphemous"
to question God, they drilled these commands into children's heads. The freedom to think is
further eradicated by, for instance, the religious hierarchy insist that one should
have faith – blind faith that is; accepting the religious position without
questioning its validity.
Indeed, for most of us, describing these religious people
came from having conversational experience with them. You know, the Christian or
Muslim friend you have that always engages you in a discussion in which you find
yourself in an argument that takes you in a continuous circle with no exit point
– (circular arguments). Well, here is a study that says what you may have
thinking about you friend/s. Of course the study looks at Political
Conservatism. However, Political Conservatives tend to also be Religious
Conservatives. They are both directly related.
“…. recent studies linking conservatism to low intelligence
and "low-effort" thinking”
“A study published in the journal "Psychological
Science" showed that children who score low on intelligence tests
gravitate toward socially conservative political views in adulthood--perhaps
because conservative ideologies stress "structure and order" that
make it easier to understand a complicated world.” (Source – Huff Post)
Not only does the study show that adult conservatives are
the product of people who may have performed lower intelligence wise as a child
but another study shows that they appear to also be "low-effort" thinkers.
“The authors test the hypothesis that low-effort thought
promotes political conservatism. In Study 1, alcohol intoxication was measured
among bar patrons; as blood alcohol level increased, so did political
conservatism (controlling for sex, education, and political identification). In
Study 2, participants under cognitive load reported more conservative attitudes
than their no-load counterparts. In Study 3, time pressure increased
participants’ endorsement of conservative terms. In Study 4, participants
considering political terms in a cursory manner endorsed conservative terms
more than those asked to cogitate; an indicator of effortful thought
(recognition memory) partially mediated the relationship between processing
effort and conservatism. Together these data suggest that political
conservatism may be a process consequence of low-effort thought; when
effortful, deliberate thought is disengaged, endorsement of conservative
ideology increases.” (Source – Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin)
Indeed, religion loves "LOW-EFFORT" thinkers and people who don’t
think at all. In fact, the Church father Thomas Aquinas defines the people who are
willing to accept religious ideology without questioning as the most virtuous.
In the free-thought community, religious folks especially those that lean towards the conserve position, has always been charged with the inability to think.
ReplyDeleteA very bold statement... based on a hypothesis - > “The authors test the hypothesis that low-effort thought promotes political conservatism..."
It is a bold statement. "the inability to think" may have been a poor chose of words, but in discussion with Conservatives, especially religious ones, expose a reluctant among them to use their minds. They more often than not to lock themselves into very narrow minded structured worldview and refuse to explore the wider world. I personally knows many religious conservatives who drop philosophy classes, for example, because it challenge them to think. As I point out, if you are political conservative, your religious view most likely to also be a religious conservative person. I think that the research also underlines influence of religious dogmas.
ReplyDeleteAlso remember that religion stresses "structure and order," from which one must not deviate, a permanent fixture in Conservatism.
ReplyDelete"religious people are more active citizens – they volunteer more, donate more to charity and are more likely to campaign on political issues"
ReplyDeletehttp://www.demos.co.uk/publications/faithfulcitizens
First I most say that there are many religious people who are good kindhearted people. They want to help others. Religion does not have monopoly on volunteering, donating to the need, etc. However, because religion creates in groups and out groups, these kindhearted people normally suspend their dogmatic religious conviction and appeal to their own inner goodness to help all people. One cannot be religiously dogmatic and be inclusively humanistic.
ReplyDelete"religious people are more active citizens" on political issues. Indeed, that may or may not be true, however, this does not mean that being politically active one cannot be a "low-effort" thinker. One certainly can be a "low-effort" thinker or none thinker and still be political active. In that I mean they can be active, but acting within a "structure and order," a worldview that is prescribe for them. They cannot think for themselves or be Free-Thinkers, so to speak. This is a trade mark of religion. The leaders does the thinking for you.