Indeed, I believe there is a certain level of frustration within
Spike Lee’s criticism of Tyler Perry in terms of the profit issue. However, I refuse
to believe that this is the essence of Spike Lee’s disapproval. In my view,
Spike Lee was interested in a more fundamental point. However, I think, by
doing it the way he did, may have been wrong.
Nonetheless, the fundamental point I deduced from Spike’s
criticism speaks more to the point that since Tyler Perry has been successful
and well establish with a substantial amount of money in his bank account, why then
continue to make these buffoonery moves that, in my view, reinforces black stereotypes.
Of course, as others have pointed out, Spike Lee’s movies are not void of aspects
that can be criticized. According to Keith Josef Adkins, for example, Spike Lee
has cast “lighter-skinned Black and/or Latina
women as his black lead's love interests.” Despite this fact, [which should not, in
anyway, be minimized], Spike Lee’s, unlike Perry, has made and continue to make
moves that addresses the real social issues plaguing the black community.
The African American community is suffering from many
serious issues. According to Michelle Alexander, author of “The New Jim Crow:
Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness” more “African American men are
in prison or jail, on probation or parole than were enslaved in 1850,” a sure sign
of major problem plaguing our young men. In addition, the socioeconomic disparity
between African American and White Americans is an appalling problem, and continues
to grow. Yet, Tyler Perry keep producing movies that, instead of tackling real social
issues, shows a gun toting enthusiast, loudmouth grandmother ready to put
others’ life in danger at the drop of a hat. Indeed, I believe, Mr. Perry has
the right to make the movies he likes and to sell them to whomever he wants. However,
Mr. Perry and those who support him is wrong to think that he should be immune to
criticism.
Yes, some of Tyler Perry’s moves, at list those I have viewed,
do highlights the problem of domestic violence, a problem that continues plaguing
black families. However, Mr. Perry’s movies, I believe, simplified the solution
by giving the impression that by just accepting God/Jesus in your life everything
will be OK, a fairytale ending that always seems to conclude Tyler’s movie. In fact, closer look at these
movies show that they endorse a fallacious idea promoted by Stave Harvey that
nonbelievers do not have morals since the script seems to have willfully excluded
God from the early part of the movies, which is often, plague with fights and dysfunctional
families. Introducing the presence God to
the very end where all the broken pieces are placed together again with God as
the glue holding them together. This method no doubt promotes the idea that to
have a good respectable relationship, God/Jesus must always be the most
important part of one’s personal and social relationship, and this is the bottom
line to Tyler Perry’s message.
However, this message is not a real solution to the problems
facing black communities. In fact, some argued that the church is part of the
problem. As I conclude, I will ask Tyler Perry to go to the make-believe hell
he and his fans believe exist. You can
and should be criticized. On one hand, I hope, Dr. Cornel West is correct, in
that Mr. Perry can mature into someone that produces materials that will address
in a fundamental way the issues that is problematic to the black community, but,
on the other, I doubt that he can. I believe Tyler Perry has found his niche in
proselytize black people. He is unlike the black “prosperity doctrine”
preachers, swindling money out from the pocket of these black people [especially
black women] by selling a false hope to a people who are looking for a way out of
the unpleasant state of black communities.
Your thoughts
No comments:
Post a Comment